De lo que leo x ahí, todo Dios está pensando en Orbiting DataCenters: Nvidia, Google, Amazon, etc.
Estimo que su "mercado nicho" sea el de aplicaciones donde la latencia no sea un factor crítico: back-ups, bases de datos, streaming de vídeo, portales de compras, etc.
Serán estructuras de tamaño considerable, que habrá que construir pieza a pieza en el espacio.
Al pie uno de los principales retos que han de superar.
Cooling physics
High performance compute converts almost all input power into heat. On Earth, this heat can be moved into air or liquids and rejected through cooling towers or dry coolers. In space there is no air, so after transferring heat into a coolant and then into a radiator, the only remaining option is radiative heat rejection.
At operating temperatures preferred by electronics, roughly 300 to 350 Kelvin, even an ideal radiator sheds only a few hundred watts per square meter. Real spacecraft radiators typically reject around 100 to 350 watts per square meter once emissivity and geometry are considered. That implies roughly 1 to 3 square meters of radiator per kilowatt of heat. For a 1 gigawatt data center, this translates into roughly 2.2 million square meters of radiator surface, effectively a structure over one kilometer on each side, making cooling the primary engineering constraint.