I have a dream

I now know for sure that it is a dream shared by a vast majority of Catalans

I have a dream that one day people will stop being Catalan independence and simply be. That may be a free country like any other, where our institutions will not be threatened every day by the courts of a state that does not represent us and with which we identify most Catalans. Because I want to live anymore repression of three hundred years ago when all of them were abolished by force of arms.

I have a dream that one day our language is not a language because it will protect acquired enough strength and maturity as the language of an independent state. More than any other generation ever suffer repression suffered by our ancestors who were forbidden to talk about it, write it and say it, but that does not mean they stop loving.

I have a dream that one day will be us who manage our taxes. And delivery decide what to spend the fruits of our efforts and stop the pillaging that we have been suffering for so many years, we are forced to haggle and be mediocre in many vital issues.

I have a dream that one day justice will be done to the historical memory and ask forgiveness for Spain inhumane treatment that many Catalans suffered during the Franco dictatorship, which caused many victims and even today have not been dignified. Which will open trials against those who have not yet been tried for the crimes they committed and thus many families will begin to close those wounds so painful that remain open.

I have a dream that one day all Catalans will be respected, whatever their beliefs, their culture, their religion and their skin color, they all have the same rights whether male or female and regardless regardless of their sexual orientation. And we will be able to live without forming ghettoes, accepting the wealth of our diversity.

I have a dream that one day we will live in a country where social rights are a priority and the word corruption is exchanged our dictionaries the word transparency. Which is not well seen the usurper who live and taking advantage of others, I do not want to live in a country lazarillos.

I have a dream that one day our children will have enough opportunities in our country, who will be forced to go abroad. And those who one day had to emigrate may return against their will, because we need young people to build a new country and live stronger, fairer and more courageous.

I have a dream that one day we will live in a country where culture is its greatest wealth, where governments no longer see investment in culture as an expense and will assess how best bets to train citizens better.

I have a dream that one day our country will have the necessary care of our environment so that we can enjoy together for many, many years, so these wonderful landscapes we have. I do not want to leave my children a country that compulsive consumerism collapse under a pile of debris.

I have this dream and now I know for sure that it is a dream shared by a vast majority of Catalans, so I know that together we will fight to make it possible. I know that nothing can stop us so long that we have lost the fear. Because as said Ovidi Montllor: "We no longer feed crumbs, now want the whole bread."

Que bonito Juanmart, veo que eres aficionado a la escritura ¿cuando publicarás este futuro best seller ?

Un consejo cambia el titulo porque I have a dream no le pega a tu obra, hazte un favor a ti mismo y no plagies al Sr. Martin Luther King que es el que dijo esta frase porque tenia motivos mas que justificados para decirla y llevarla a cabo.

Sorry, dear Juanmart but I could not resist answering.
The poem is the best known of Peter Calderón of the Boat, in the soliloquy of Segismundo:

Sueña el rey que es rey, y vive
con este engaño mandando,
disponiendo y gobernando;
y este aplauso, que recibe
prestado, en el viento escribe,
y en cenizas le convierte
la muerte, ¡desdicha fuerte!
¿Que hay quien intente reinar,
viendo que ha de despertar
en el sueño de la muerte?
Sueña el rico en su riqueza,
que más cuidados le ofrece;
sueña el pobre que padece
su miseria y su pobreza;
sueña el que a medrar empieza,
sueña el que afana y pretende,
sueña el que agravia y ofende,
y en el mundo, en conclusión,
todos sueñan lo que son,
aunque ninguno lo entiende.

Yo sueño que estoy aquí
destas prisiones cargado,
y soñé que en otro estado
más lisonjero me vi.
¿Qué es la vida? Un frenesí.
¿Qué es la vida? Una ilusión,
una sombra, una ficción,
y el mayor bien es pequeño:
que toda la vida es sueño,
y los sueños, sueños son.

Vamos, que viene que ni pintado.

La verdad es que prefiero que escribas los post también en catalán y no sólo en inglés que por lo menos aprendemos más idiomas.

Saludos poéticos.

Benvolgut Alcalde!

No eres hombre de cometer faltas de ortografía y tus frases muchas veces en castellano antiguo son un placer leerlas, pero me temo y sin que sirva de precedente que esta vez has cometido un ligero error involuntario lo sé, pero no puedo consentir que el mencionado se quede ahí sin pena ni gloria.

Entiendo que esta marea o esta brisa (como te guste más) británica que envuelve a Rankia en los útimos tiempos, ha conseguido envolverte a ti también, vamos a ver ¿es qué no sabes que los nombres y apellidos no se traducen y se mantienen tal cual en su idioma de origen?

¿Qué diría Don Pedro Calderón de la Barca? si viera su nombre medio traducido al idioma de Guillem* (perdón quiero decir William) Shakespeare.

Saludos risueños Alcalde.

Guillem* = Guillermo o William (a gusto de cada cual) :D

Al igual que Julema te corrijo.

Peter Cauldronnn of the boat.

Me gustan los temas que saca el muchacho este porque dan mucho que hablar y que pensar.

Buenas, julema.
Bienhallada sea vuesa merced, maese julema. Consiento sin queja vuestra reprimenda y enmienda, mas..., no dudéisni por un instante que no doy puntada sin hilo ni manuscribo palabra sin intención.
Realmente no sabría qué decir si Mike Olkfield con su gran album "tubular bells" se transformara en Miquel Campoviejo y "campanar tubulares"., je, je, je.

Saludos con toda la intención ya sea en inglés o castellano antiguo.

The vagueness of Mariano Rajoy appearing like a president "ready" to "not allow" a unilateral statement said, without say how- does not mean that the PP does not work to build a legislative arsenal thought to the day after the 27-S with new emergency powers to join those already in the Constitution of 1978. The constitutional commission of Congress, the PP yesterday approved with the vote of the PSOE and UPD also the national security bill, which now travels the Senat- that gives an ace Rajoy: use the assumption of a "situation of interest to national security" because the Spanish president and a community intervention can attribute their skills to the extreme to assume control as a police force Mossos, in order to "defend Spain."

With the primeval desire to combat new threats such as international cybersecurity and bioterrorism, the wording of the law woke up early suspicion included in Article 3 that the text was created to "ensure the defense of Spain and their constitutional principles and values. " While the vice president, Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría, denies that the new law can be invoked against the process, "constitutional values" are not just among the objectives to kill jihadist terrorism. I suspect that the bill made leering stage Catalan forums has been fueled by the Minister of Justice, Rafael Catalan, then presume that Spain already has "adequate mechanism" to stop independence He added that the moment of truth, "operate all instruments" to enforce the letter of the constitution.

With unease installed, ERC spokesman, Joan afternoon yesterday gave the PP an opportunity to disprove that he is not "legislative sharpening weapons" against Catalonia and presented an amendment that said the timing of security interest "in no way can be taken in response to the decisions taken by regional parliaments." But the PP, the PSOE vote too, refused to include the nuance. "If we wanted to say that we had it easy paranoid about accepting this point, this decline is proof of the cotton we are not paranoid," became convinced later.

While Rajoy government boasts of having already enough arsenal to curb the desire Catalan, the truth is that, apart from recourse to CT, intervention pure and reserves that Article 155 of the Constitution to force Rajoy make a request before the president of the Generalitat. Should be disregarded, the executive may approve the "necessary measures" to force the "forced compliance" obligations "that the Constitution and other laws impose" if Catalonia to "act in a way that seriously undermine the public interest Spain. " The road, however, is not agile: Rajoy should go to the Senate to get the absolute majority the PP -the a- and the road is uncertain because Article 155 is not never been applied in 37 years. "So to be able GET the sin efecto tanto note that care," he uttered the famous statement coverinh Late Spanish prosecutor Jose Rodrigo Villalpando January 1716. "If there is a will of the majority, that not even God has not Rajoy "Late riveted. "The first I do not know, but the vote to vote Catalans Rajoy stop it," said the president of Congress, Jesus Posada.

From the PP yesterday denied most of the reason for the law. "What to do with Catalonia? And Castilla-La Mancha, and Torrelodones ... I wish we did not have a law like this would mean that we have no threats, "said the deputy of the PP Beatriz Rodríguez Salmones. "Nothing, nothing, nothing to do. Zero! "He insisted. To dispel any suspicion, the deputy got to sell the law was a prayer CDC. "We recently had an interpellation Jordi Xuclà saying that what happened with smallpox vaccines ... If it was he who protested the action of the State!" Remains. The deputy Toni Pico from Unio share the goal of addressing safety but not "the letter" a "pretext" to remove powers and the "PP and PSOE agree to centralize them into organs of State. " José Enrique Serrano (PSOE) recalled that the law was created in 2009 but was vague on the plan Rajoy: "One thing which will be used and a willingness with which he was born." "There appears innocent way at the moment, "said Joan Josep Nuet (ICV).

Guided by the rush, the PP has speeded up the process of the law to be ready in September. To the extent that the draft was adopted on 16 January as organic law and the Council of Ministers in May became the ordinary grounds, with the approval of the State Council chaired by the extresorer PP-Romay Beccaria- not affect the rights or freedoms. To hammer home the key yesterday was approved in committee with full legislative powers, a trick that avoids the vote in plenary and hit the turbo more.

Bona tarda, Juanmart. una cordial salutació, Euskal guztiei agurra cordial.

Una opinión muy personal la que te dejo a continuación.
Creo que es una equivocación por parte de quienes defendéis la independencia de Cataluña ante España el tratar de identificar al gobierno del pp con los intereses o convicciones del resto de españoles, asemejando todos los males, fallos, corruptelas... del gobierno de turno con la idiosincrasia de todos los españoles, circunstancia que realmente irrita a mucha gente (ya no te digo ná si metemos en el ajo al tío Paco para intentar justificar cualquier cosa, porque hablamos de un régimen que no tiene nada que ver con el actual y que se difuminó hace décadas). Del mismo modo actúan los políticos independentistas catalanes identificando cualquier ataque contra su persona con un embate hacia el independentismo (jo sóc Catalunya , Catalunya sóc jo). La verdad es, que, pensándolo fríamente, aquellos errores que intento imputar al independentismo catalán (o vasco), son asimismo imputables en mayor o menor medida a los gobiernos de turno de España.

Por mi parte no hallarás defensa alguna hacia el partido popular, o socialista, o podemos, o iu, o..., porque considero que todos son lobos del mismo pelaje (Paco "el rana" es de otra raza aparte, la de los dictadores).

No tengas duda alguna de que somos muchos (la gran mayoría) de españoles quienes sentimos a Cataluña y País Vasco como parte de nosotros mismos y de nuestros corazones y que no nos mueve animosidad o desdén alguno hacia esos grandes pueblos.

Saludos integradores, reconociendo la propia idiosincrasia.

Twenty years ago ... forty years, seventy-one, seventy-four years hundred and thirty-two, two hundred thirty-four years, five hundred years, six hundred thirty-six years, six hundred eighty-three years ... seven hundred and fifteen years ago ... It is the historical key that separates us to the Basque villages of the desired national unity. We have been disintegrated by force and by the cunning policy. They have tried those times and as many away our identity to dress in strange clothes that they have never met. We want to be what we are in the concert of nations of the world, without giving up an inch of our national spirit, without lowering our Basque fellowship. The historical time that separates us from the kingdom vascón forged after the battle of Orreaga in 778, his lacerating dates territorial division, remains intact in our continuing claims remain faithful to their ancestral language, its peculiar customs, its people stamped on our democratic right Jurisdictions, his concept of social justice.

We have never been so close to achieving our ideal. The four mayors of provincial capitals can be understood in the ancient language and spread his hands in a quest for social and political improvements, and two presidents of the Basque country, in your day to Rome Basques can talk fluently in the same. It is a fact that comes from much previous suffering, but also the implant of universities in our country, the better reconciliation between culture and economy, social reconciliation that goes beyond the barriers of policy bigoted chiefs who, pushing Nabarra of its natural place, it aims to create a kingdom of Taifa.

I remember people who have led the fight of a lifetime to this unprecedented historical moment: a Manuel Irujo that was entirely devoted to this mission of unity, this union of peoples Basques units, scattered her family in exile, but he tireless worker for the cause of Euskadi. There is no better cultural heritage of the Buenos Aires Publishing Ekin, who immersed herself in the hands of Lopez Mendizabal and Andres Irujo, restoring memory Franco tried to sweep beams of fire; as the work of Euzkadi7Euzkadi Irratia Radio of Venezuela, where a member of the Irujo, Pello family, formed the core team of information that Basque resistance. Lizarra a mayor murdered and abandoned on the edge of a cemetery in Tajonar no other charge to be nationalist Basque.

We have resisted, each in his stronghold, but we have not come down the road, yes to a major junction thereof. And it is making mention of those men and women who came to batzoki Iruña, then alkartetxe, forty years ago, everyone from his position, but integrating all a fervent idealism. I remember the crowd that filled the hall ready to envelope the papers of the first votes, each talking about their painful memories of repression for forty years. Renaissance expected of a new policy for the good of Navarre and the historical reconciliation Nabarra separations. I saw them calloused hands, some deformed by arthritis, but I remember more eyes bright hope for the coming times. Rallies of that time were studded with the essence of the future, of that magic reunion, that confidence in the future together would be better than in the past separated.

I come to mind many names, infinite faces, words that fell in the heat of those councils, solidarity hugs, tears soaked the defeat with our eyes but could not bend our shoulders because we had resisted too, we and our ancestors, to resign to capitulation. In the embrace of consolation enough for a break in the march to continue in line with our purposes, non-violence, who had armed and institutional equally, and persist in the idea that one day the peoples forged the kingdom of Nabarra, the greatest success of the Basque genius in the words of Manuel Irujo, could meet again to jointly forge a destiny which would fit both the social and cultural harmony. With open arms where we could exercise our cultural administrative and business skills, our economic ties and no offense to anyone but all happy. It dreamed that society as a garden paradise with flowers and fruits, but forged in the hard work of a blacksmith, forge, fire, human effort, sweat and tears.

It is a glorious day that we're living today, although we expect days of great efforts. We can not let alone the president in office Barkos, or his team, because we should be all as one man, and one woman, in monitoring our work. Our future depends on it, which have forged Europe since prehistoric times. Few people take upon themselves the burden immemorial and few towns such as Basque are willing to bear. And I keep my dream, that by far the mill, comes the water / urrutiaren ura boluradator ... according to our proverb.

Buenas, licenciado Juanmart.
Me parece correcto que colguéis post en inglés, catalán, euskera, gallego..., o en el idioma que deseéis; pero las normas más elementales de cortesía cuando dos personas civilizadas intentan mantener una conversación, exigen responder al interlocutor de forma directa y no copiando una vez tras otra, de manera machacona y obessiva, textos o pensamientos ajenos (sin indicar jamás el autor) y además en el idioma que ambos dominen.
Se trata de una falta de respeto absoluta, que demuestra sin ningún genero de dudas la ausencia de deseo alguno de debatir o intercabiar opiniones, así como cualquier mínimo atisbo de civilización.
Luego vienen quejas propias o ajenas sobre las contestaciones fuera de tono que vos, licenciado Juanmart, recibís de otros foreros; en muchos casos estoy de acuerdo, pero está claro que cuando uno siembra vientos recoge tempestades.

No mostráis Respeto ni Esfuerzo por alcanzarlo, ninguna Educación, pero sí total carencia de Responsabilidad.
Resulta complicado que no ansíe mantener un intercambio dialéctico con alguien, pero sin duda vos lo lográis.
Cuando uno habla solo..., termina solo.

Saludos sin civilización al australopithecus

Yo también te voy a dejar otra opinión muy personal. Sinceramente creo que está totalmente legitimado, el poder hacer extensible las criticas del PP a sus votantes ya que sus votantes comparten a pies juntillas ese tipo de ideología. Ideología que para mi tiene serios tintes fascistoiodes. Evidentemente esto no lo hago extensivo a sus diversas corruptelas, de las que son evidentemente responsables exclusivamente ellos.

Perplejo me dejas con lo que el anterior régimen "se difuminó"...le podríamos poner muchos matices a semejante afirmación , pero bueno...te lo voy a pasar por alto.

Es curioso no obstante como casi todos los llamados "unionistas"... de una forma machacona, día si y día también habéis intentado sistemáticamente relacionar al Sr. Pujol con el independentismo y convertirlo en vuestro particular chivo expiatorio.

Es realmente cómico que un Sr. que hace 13 años dejó la presidencia de la Generalitat y en su vida nunca pronunció la palabra independencia (manda eggs, verdad Alcalde...) y os empecinéis en atacar al independentismo a través de este señor, como si el enano cabrón fuera el mismísimo William Wallace.

Es decir y acabando... que mientras veo totalmente legítimo atacar a los votantes del PP...porque para mi por lo menos...(algunos o quizá es mejor decir una gran mayoría, lo veo más acertado) son el espejo y alma de ese "facherio" rimbombante por España de sus dirigentes...has atacado en reiteradas ocasiones a Pujol tú y todos los "otros"...sin rascaros las vestiduras...y eso que hace más de 13 años que dejó de ser presidente de la Generalitat.

Como ves es un acto de cinismo mayúsculo, que seguramente no te has parado a meditarlo. Si fueras otra persona te acusaría directamente de ser un cínico, pero en tu caso...no te lo voy a decir, porque eres una de las personas más cordiales de Rankia.

Bona nit.

During the last twenty years, the Valencian region has been the laboratory of a well-planned language policy, which pursued a clear and properly defined goal: exterminate the Valencian-Catalan language from public life. For reasons of electoral convenience, this goal has never openly expressed. On the contrary, it has been disguised in a patina of regionalist folclorismo seasoned with fiery declarations of love for the language (made most often in Castilian), conveniently dosed in the electorally opportune moments. Essentially, we can say that the role of the PP government reserved for the Valencian language was restricted to shout 'Visca la Mare de Deu! and 'Senyor pirotècnic, pot començar the mascletà' . And always they found that could be used to stir up discord and conflict, to say (again, usually in Castilian) that Valencian and Catalan were not the same language. Throughout the rest of public and private life they were very happy if passed entirely in Castilian.

It's been twenty years of this medication, and the results are highly visible both in the linguistic landscape of villages and Valencian capital, as in the desert landscape of the media. Not in the spoken language, which, surprisingly, maintains a perfectly audible vitality If we heed, while conveniently invisible by the ubiquitous standard of linguistic subordination.

With the political change, an aspect that many people expected to change significantly is precisely the language. And this brings to the table a number of challenges, I would like to summarize in ten priority objectives.

1. Retrieve the institutional prestige. A language they did not speak hardly ever the authorities can hardly have some kind of prestige. Recall that both the former president of the Generalitat, as the mayor of Valencia or Alicante were not able to correctly pronounce or a whole sentence. Elected officials of this new period have a responsibility to make proper, decent and consistent use of Valencian, without automatically subordinated to the language of the partners. It will be important not to make foolish mistakes as translators themselves of their public statements. Doing this will cut them and the language, because it clearly conveys the message that knowledge of Catalan is unnecessary, and therefore irrelevant.

2. Change the language of normal use in public administrations. Under the leadership of Castilianist party, the Valencian administration has been, in terms of internal functioning, indistinguishable from Valladolid. 'Everything in Castilian and the Castilian', seems to have been the highest authority in the last twenty years. As citizens, we would explicitly ask (often several times) that we dirigiese administration in Valencia, to achieve full-often Spelling- communications failures in our official language. We must standardize and establish default, the use of the language in internal and external communications of the different administrations Valencia.

3. Transcending education. One of the strengths of linguistic exterminators has been to instill the idea that 'language' is an issue that affects only the educational field (and then also try minorizarla this area). To understand the falseness of this idea just you have to see how the other (the only one that is really official: the Castilian) official language no such restriction occurs. Language is just one of the cross members of any society. Or health, or the economy or urban planning, or any other aspect of social life can be developed without language: everything is done in one language or another, and the return of Valencia to the status of normality rightful can not entrusted exclusively to education.

4. Be cross. I am convinced that much good work done by the Directorate General for Language Policy and Management Multilingualism, organically located in the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. It will require, however, that each and every one of the actions of the Valencian institutions so with linguistic perspective; ie without ignoring it all done in one language or another, and that the responsibility of governments is to move towards linguistic equality. Remember that there is already a part of the Valencian population, which prefers to express in Castilian, that has all perfect and effectively recognized linguistic rights. Are the rights of the other speakers, those who prefer to live in Valencia, which we must defend and advance to equate with those of its neighbors. No democratic society should tolerate the existence of citizens first and second; and that is what is happening right now in Valencia.

5. dignify the names. The Castilian villages have a name: yours. By contrast, the Valencian towns have two: his Anglicized version and conveniently. Roads full of absurdities as Elx / Elche, Sagunt / Sagunto or Benicàssim / Benicasim, which do not provide any relevant information and, instead, clearly convey an image of subordination unworthy. Each town or city should have only one name, each person reading it, as well as deliver their phonics skills will allow. The legislation gives each municipal corporation the power to decide which graphics form must have the name of its people is absurd that only intended to contribute to deregulation and prestige of the Valencian names. This should be corrected by a new regulation adopted by the courts.

6. Leave the supremacist bilingualism. The guiding principle of this perversion is: everything that is in Catalan must also be in Spanish, but not vice versa. It does not apply exclusively to the place names, and intended to convey the idea that the language is quite dispensable. Moreover, it is not necessary that anyone be contaminated by reading. That's why conveniently translations so difficult to decipher messages as 'Nord / North' or 'Directorate / Direction' are provided. It is insulting to both the Catalan and for the intelligence of readers. Anyone able to understand what 'North' means also knows what it means 'Nord', without translation. An efficient multilingualism should replace this practice: what is important to understand that many people (eg emergency instructions or information of interest) must be in several languages. And it must assume institutionally that, as perfectly explains Professor Moreno Cabrera, anyone who dominates the Castilian is also perfectly able to understand instructions written in Catalan.

7. Getting the private sector. Another major achievement of the extermination policy that have had to endure is to have bequeathed legislation deprotected absolutely Valencian in the sphere of private activity. Shops, business or large areas have no legal obligation to respect the rights of the Valencian-speaking. Everything is therefore at the mercy of the goodwill of companies. Even before blatantly pancastellanista modify this legislation, political power can greatly influence the propensity to use private sector (and thus prestige) Valencian.

8. Lost collaboration with civil society. Previous governments identified as 'the enemy' the rich Valencian associations, and specifically, the associations working for the Valencian language and culture. Not only they have despised but who have fought with all the means at its disposal (remember, for example, the millions in fines -and finally, declared illegal-against Cultural Acció of the Valencià Country). Now a period in which municipalities, county councils and the Generalitat may cooperate honestly with civil society to achieve the common goal of restoring normalcy cultural and linguistic opens every society needs.

9. Desconflictivizar language. If you need to identify the most successful of all who have perpetrated antivalencianas policies of previous governments, I would stress the conflictivización. Connote as conflicting use of a language is a highly effective way to reduce their use and to discourage both current speakers as to which they could learn. Many aspects have been stigmatized by way of associating with conflict situations (including the impunity of violence against people, because speaking in Valencian use). Palm, but surely it leads the birthday theme: Valencian or Catalan? Valencia have said and say 'Valencia' in the language we speak, for centuries. And probably we continue to do so. It is not a paranormal phenomenon; even stranger. They do so Mallorca, Menorca or Ibiza, in our own language area, Argentines Andalusians or the Spanish, or many Americans in the United States, in the Anglophone. And that does not mean to ignore or deny the name that their language is internationally known. I think this is a good horizon for Valencia; a perfectly homologous denomination that does not imply any denial of identity with other variants of the Catalan-speaking territories, and you should not oppose in any way. There will, therefore, legally recognize the equivalence of the double 'Catalan' name and 'Valencia' to finally overcome the interested use of contrast.

10. Generate models. Not only in the political and institutional level should visualize the Valencian language as perfectly normal and legitimate use. They also need to become visible role models in areas such as music, entertainment, sports, leisure, holidays, etc. Mainstreaming is just that. And it is that which gives 'normal' use of language; they do each other in all kinds of records, from colloquial to the most educated, and in all kinds of situations. Normal languages ​​already have that. Tune into any TV channel in French, English or Spanish and can check immediately. The recovery of own means of communication and self-centered will be central to achieving this ultimate goal.

There are probably more, and it is certain that they are all interdependent, and have to get synchronously. If it is necessary to summarize all the goals into one, I say that the new administration must act Valencia, in every one of its initiatives, linguistic perspective. This is without forgetting that everything we do works for, or in contravention of the language that, despite having official status recognized from a few decades ago, more than three hundred years ago did not have even a minimum institutional support. Move towards linguistic equality is a moral and democratic duty, the new government should not shy away from any of their actions.

Buenas, Serrallonga.
Resulta un placer debatir contigo al igual que con muchos otros foreros, pues, independientemente de que tengamos opiniones acordes o dispares en unos u otros ámbitos de la vida, respetas unas normas mínimas de educación y cortesía; eres capaz de argumentar tus pensamientos y exponerlos de forma coherente, cuando las reflexiones no son de tu propia cosecha aportas la fuente (¿tan complicado resulta para otros?) y admites el debate de ideas así como el intercambio de pareceres opuestos; asimismo respondes a tu interlocutor en el idioma que estimas que ambos dominamos (si el menda hablara catalán no tendría inconveniente en hablar contigo así, pero, tengo la mala suerte de no hacerlo).

Me parece coherente lo que indicas sobre los votantes de cualquier partido político; cuando un ciudadano ejerce su voto libremente a una formación política por primera vez, si ese partido hace una gestión desastrosa, sus dirigentes se comportan y hablan como hienas y acémilas, se corrompen hasta la médula...., aquella decisión es excusable por desconocimiento del ciudadano o engaño por parte de los políticos; eso sí, cuando el ciudadano, conociendo el comportamiento indecente del partido al que votó vuelve a a repetir su voto por segunda vwz, significa que asume, permite, aplaude y comparte todos y cada uno de los comportamientos y actitudes de sus políticos. Por lo indicado en este párrafo, no me identifico en modo alguno con el pp, ni con psoe, ni con iu-podemos-ciu-upn-ciudadanos.... (con otros partidos y sus votantes no me identifico, pues otrora cuando se dedicaban al terrorismo, asesinato, secuestro, extorsión, tráfico de drogas... y posteriormente sus actuales dirigentes y simpatizantes se volvieron... ¿democráticos?, siguieron defendiendo los mismos ideales y no condenaron anteriores actuaciones..., pero..., ese es otro tema aparte).

Sobre la total desaparición del régimen antrior, a veces yo también albergo serias dudas; en sueños creo ver svásticas y banderas pre constitucionales en fotos y declaraciones de políticos, e incluso tengo la sensación de escuchar noticias parecidas al no-do en el parte de las tres; pero deben ser paranoias mías.

Personalmente me gustaría que España se mantuviera unida (pero lo de "unionista" no me gusta nada, a no ser que vosotros seaís los "confederados"; je, je, es broma), pero desde luego no he sido ni seré de aquellos que relacionó machaconamente al nada honorable Pujol y su entorno con la independencia, sino más bien con la indecencia, que son dos cosas muy distintas; así que la persona verbal la tienes equivocada conmigo, ya que no se trata de segunda persona del plural (vosotros habéis, vosotros os empecináis), sino tercera persona del plural (ellos han, ellos se han empecinado).

Si me acusas de ser mordaz, punzante, satírico, irónico, corrosivo... y a veces lacerante rayando la crueldad..., pues sí, ¡yo me acuso, mea culpa!, pero mal orientas tu dedo acusador de cinismo hacía mí, pues si he de responder, reprochar, satirizar o ultrajar a otro u otros, lo hago siempre em primera persona del singular, clarito y a la cara, para que no quepa la más mínima duda, además con la verdad por delante y si yerro en mi exposición por ignorancia mostrándome posteriormente los demás mi equivocación, pido disculpas (como he hecho ya muchas veces, hago y seguiré haciendo sin perder un solo anillo), aprendiendo de mi error para no repetirlo más.

Serrallonga, después de todo, un placer debatir contigo, ya sea en español, catalán, inglés, latín o arameo.

Que lo que los hombres unieron no lo separen los políticos, je, je.

Saludos cordiales en primera persona del singular, amigo catalán.

The president of Navarra, uxue barkos, said that relations with the Basque Government with "absolute normality" versus what has been "so far" that has been "an absolute abnormality in unrelated" arises.

"With absolute normality, also attending to our cultural, historical reality, socio-economic policy," he added in an interview Barkos Onda Vasca.

Moreover, it has given "for granted" that can be seen EiTB in Navarra and regretted this "sterile controversy" of governments of UPN and which has been "punish" citizens.

Barkos has indicated that programming EiTB is collected, for example, in the newspapers of La Rioja "with absolute normality." "And it does not seem reasonable that has not occurred here," she added.

In relation to the Executive, she has indicated that its priorities are social in nature and is intended to undertake "with great ambition and rigor" measures to overcome "what years of economic austerity, war economy leaves made socially" with "significant pocket of poverty to be attacked." Other priorities have to do with the generation of economic activity and employment and Navarre autgobierno.

Barkos said that, for now, have no "complete" information on the situation of Navarre coffers and have some "first steps" to discuss "more closely". However, she assured that the fact that in the first five months of the year have already exceeded the deficit target of 0.7% set for the year "is not a good thing to start."

As highlighted, the news is a "cold shower" for the government and, although he acknowledged that not caught him "off guard," she stressed that they have to "work with it"

In this sense, she pointed out that it is time for a Budget that "do not conform to the actual situation of the treasury" and further borrowing capacity is "very limited". Therefore, it has indicated that they will have to work "more efficient" and create revenue that can be done through the tax field and a "good negotiation" of the Navarre Convention.

Moreover, despite criticism from some areas to the Minister of Interior, María José Beaumont, she said it was "obvious" that he would seek "any loophole" for the "attack" and stressed that the minister had a "platform for staging capacity," which has left the government team "quite satisfied".

Moreover, he noted that within the framework agreement is to promote a commission of inquiry into Caja Navarra in terms of "political responsibility" and noted that the commitment is "firm".

Reclaiming dialogue and democratic debate as resources, even revolutionary. Kolakowski law, as other calls like the one born as critical thinking

Leszek Kolakowski was a Polish philosopher who died six years ago, in the summer of 2009. He finished his days at Oxford, after his slip Marxist thought, before the fall of the Soviet Bloc, to the swamps of liberalism. His treatises on the history of philosophy and Marxism, and the recovery of its legacy in today's Poland, have left their mark on some of the contemporary intelligentsia, including the title of this article, the law of the infinite cornucopia.

A law that has nothing to do with the claims of the Macondo Aureliano Buendia Garcia Marquez, or dietary cronopios to which we invited Julio Cortazar. Even with some aspects of the Gag Law, not for its severity, they serve to playful delight in the tedious summer evenings, when the sun warns his authority. The Law of the cornucopia is a serious thing.

The cornucopia is, in the words of those who do not master the language, the cornucopia. Zeus broke with one of its rays a horn of the goat that had nursed a child, Amalthea. As compensation, he was awarded the attribute that anyone who possessed that horn being awarded as desired.

Kolakowski made a rhetorical turn to the mythological horn and made the Act. The truth is that I found a few weeks ago in one of the last books of John Le Carré, those who leave for these summer dates. The definition, the exact copy by, said: "In essence, the law states that there is an infinite number of explanations for any event. Unlimited. "

As like language also dominated the philosophy, I have not come to understand the link between legend and law horn Kolakowski, who, after all, has no scientific basis. Philosophers are found in bars, libraries, gyms and TV debates. Never in a laboratory. But it applies as if it had an academic grounds.

I sense the cornucopia, however, that post-modernist, at this point in the film, dialectics no longer makes sense line. And they are attached to those who exercise power law to the detriment of contrast, guided by slogans as if humanity were a flock of wild sheep in the Pyrenees, on the brink of extinction, waiting whistle shepherd to move their hind legs and blinded to the fold.

Apparently, and he is listening to those postmodern, and there is no cause and effect, or content or form or essence and phenomenon. Fernandez Diaz, the Spanish Interior Minister, that his every appearance raises the question of whether it is a mariafanía or levitation Goat Legion (well, today has given me Caprinae), is an example. His slogan to revile the current coach of Bayern Munich football fan for supporting the Catalan sovereignty process has broken the sound barrier. By fetched. But enter Kolakowski logic that ideas, even Martian (or in the case of Marian Fernandez Diaz) can be argued.

The origin of the dialectic in ancient Greece was to source dialogue. And I do not want to make a metaphor modern Greece, it would be simple. Prior to our era Greeks conceived the dialectic as a form of conversation, controversy. Marx and Engels believed in evolution, a kind of society, marriage, between events, things and ideas.

If the infinite cornucopia is our destiny, like the end of history that we predicted the visionary former Fukuyama, only we would follow gurus, journalists interested, reserved funds to pay lobbyists or any sign, corrupt politicians, who are those with more than defend, and leaders twiteros maximum 140 letters.

And three-year periods ago, I do not get the expression used by economists state, the illustrious Javier Tusell appropriated Cornucopia law to bleach process Lizarra-Garazi and, incidentally, spank Aznar and Ibarretxe. At first for allowing the management of the process, the second by direct, considering that after it left the omnipresent nationalist who incidentally, his newspaper "El Pais" daily was apaleaba.

These three five days have passed and these pages of the same newspaper, in power after his bankruptcy administration and banking tips American funds (trend continues until our house with Euskaltel as a paradigm), continue to validate the cornucopia. This time the target was the fall of the regime, at least in form, in Navarre.

And because of the raid on the Macondo of García Márquez I will take leave to quote a second time. In the years of war in Colombia, that also seemed infinite, one of the players asked about the difference between liberals and conservatives. Not witty response was less successful: "A conservative is going to Mass on Sunday at 5 pm, and a liberal is going to Mass at 8 pm that same Sunday." Find the difference, if any, it is a matter of split seconds.

With "El Pais" and the author of the latest letters about the change in Nafarroa happens the same. You do not know if you're reading the newspaper Cebrian, to "The Reason" Marhuenda or "ABC" spurred by Bergaretxe and cya Vocento. In a blind tasting, contests as wine, cheese or marmitako, would have serious difficulty differentiating few other items. Moreover, I would not bet on myself. The manchetas mistaken.

José Luis Barber, the cornucopio of "El País", despite being retired, is back on track. In 2011 he left one of his most impressive deli when, ignoring common sense and objective data released ETA in its statement of final cessation of its armed activity, he fell to a shared pool then only by conspiracy theorists, consumers of hallucinogens and some other affected by mariafonías. This was a trap. He had not, he said, intended to disarmament.

This time the story has slipped encapitulada in three installments to be exact. A Chinese story moved from Beijing to Cintruénigo. In Nafarroa democracy it has nearly perfect, until it has reached the nationalist left and has screwed up everything. How? Reasons of State: "The people of Navarre is a tense, tamed and cowed society." Pyrenean mountain sheep into the fold makes quinquenniums incited by Jon Idigoras and now reduced to block Asier Arraiz.

The force of the Law of the infinite cornucopia, to make valid all interpretations, however absurd they may be, meaningless leaves the value of dialectics and, above all, dialogue. If all the reasons have deep support, why dialogue? If there is only black and white why nature strives to show tones, colors and many shades?

The danger of the disappearance of dialogue, the dialectic of the dispute, reaches us fully, because it involves the imposition victory. Imposing its way through the threat, in general, is the modus vivendi which we have suffered since we can remember, since our ancestors buried in a ditch by "controversial" or what was then the same, by "criminals".

Reclaiming dialogue and democratic debate as resources, even revolutionary. Kolakowski law, as other similar calls, born as criticism of the single thought. And they did not open the fan, but, on the contrary, we tripping over themselves to one single thought, but as usual, on behalf of a supposedly democratic value, the futility of values.